Author: Tom Kerrigan
Date: 00:57:45 12/07/99
Go up one level in this thread
I'll work on getting my e-mail address updated. I guess ftime does seem a little unix-ish. I don't know if it's ANSI C or not. But it is supported in Visual C++, gcc, and Turbo C 2. Anyway, the reason I use ftime instead of something else is because it returns the time in milliseconds. I think it's surprising that CW doesn't support it. (?) -Tom On December 06, 1999 at 22:14:44, William Bryant wrote: >Tom, > Your email address with CCC is outdated -- so I'll post the bench result here. >(This email bounced, the CCC address is earthlink.) > >Tom, > >I get slightly better results on my Mac G3 than you posted. > >Speed: 41387 nps >Computer: G3/266 mhz, OS 8.6, No Extensions >Compiler: Metrowerks 5.2, Full Optimization (Level 4) > >Note: the time routine you used is ?unix?. I simply used the intrinsic MacOS >timing function (which is in tics or 60th of a second) and made a minor >modification to main(). > >These are the results. > >William >wbryant@ix.netcom.com > > > >Tom Kerrigan's Simple Chess Program (TSCP) >version 1.4, 12/6/99 >Copyright 1997 Tom Kerrigan > >"help" displays a list of commands. > >tscp> bench >ply nodes score pv > 1 134 21 c1e3 > 2 3987 6 g5e4 d6c7 > 3 10119 31 g5e4 d6c7 c1e3 > 4 178154 31 g2d5 d6d5 c1f4 b8a8 > 5 627028 38 g2d5 d6d5 c1f4 b8a8 f2f3 >Time: 909 ticks >ply nodes score pv > 1 134 21 c1e3 > 2 3987 6 g5e4 d6c7 > 3 10119 31 g5e4 d6c7 c1e3 > 4 178154 31 g2d5 d6d5 c1f4 b8a8 > 5 627028 38 g2d5 d6d5 c1f4 b8a8 f2f3 >Time: 909 ticks >ply nodes score pv > 1 134 21 c1e3 > 2 3987 6 g5e4 d6c7 > 3 10119 31 g5e4 d6c7 c1e3 > 4 178154 31 g2d5 d6d5 c1f4 b8a8 > 5 627028 38 g2d5 d6d5 c1f4 b8a8 f2f3 >Time: 942 ticks > >Nodes: 627028 >Best time: 909 ticks >Nodes per second: 41387
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.