Author: Enrique Irazoqui
Date: 06:01:59 12/08/99
Go up one level in this thread
On December 08, 1999 at 08:43:44, Bernhard Bauer wrote: >On December 08, 1999 at 08:01:56, boyons wrote: > >>Why many people here like to compare chess program that is not available >>to the general public like Tiger12?. For me, it is not fair because others >>have no chance to justify your argument. > >Because they want to show that they have something that others don't have. >It's like driving a porsche. >They are the ELITE. This is a silly remark. There is nothing elitist about sharing findings about new programs, beta or final. I also think that it is useful for everyone to see the games played by these new programs to get an idea about them. Or do you think that "humble" silence would be more useful? No auto232 either, because 2 machines are a show off? Maybe better to use a modest 486? >They don't bother a primitive DOS interface and their benchmarks will be >always excellent. False... Mchess and Rebel are being used and loved. > They are the beta testers and they like you to cry >"when can I get that wonderfull program"? and will tell you "soon". >Have you seen one mail regarding holes or insufficiencies of Tiger12? Yes, I posted a few... >First when a progam is available to the public it shows it's real value. >Don't trust the beta testers, you have to do your benchmark yourself with >your own applications, as always. > >Kind regards Kind thanks, Enrique >Bernhard
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.