Author: blass uri
Date: 07:31:47 12/08/99
Go up one level in this thread
On December 08, 1999 at 10:09:42, Bernhard Bauer wrote: >On December 08, 1999 at 09:41:54, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: > >>On December 08, 1999 at 09:28:28, Bernhard Bauer wrote: >> >>>On December 08, 1999 at 09:01:59, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: >>> >>>>On December 08, 1999 at 08:43:44, Bernhard Bauer wrote: >>>> >>>>>On December 08, 1999 at 08:01:56, boyons wrote: >>>>> > > > >>Bernhard: being the intelligent person you are, > >Thank you very much Enrique. > > you managed to put together a >>ton of nonsense. > >A ton is pretty much. Do you feel it so heavy? > >BTW I know how benchmarks are done in other fields and >I remember a lot of praise for a lot of programs. (KK and Hiarcs for example). >Don't feel insulted, I never intended to do so. > >However, the picture of Tiger12 will change when the program is available to the >public. Then we will see messages like "why can't Tiger solve this simple >position?", "why is tiger completely blind in this simple endgame?" >And the hype will cool down until the next program ChessLion? will be >anounced. Or, if you like it, the porsche becomes old and another model is >chosen. I know that enrique posted that tiger could not solve a study because of the fact that it is a null mover. It is not a secret that tiger is not perfect(this is the reason that the programmer expect big improvement in the future) but I believe that it is better than other programs(it is leading the ssdf list). I do not think that the beta testers try to paint a wrong pictures about tiger. They got it for doing games with it and not for saying that it is number 1. You probably could also be a beta tester if you wanted to waste time about games with tiger. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.