Author: Heiko Mikala
Date: 15:18:49 12/09/99
Go up one level in this thread
Hi Thorsten! On December 09, 1999 at 13:27:11, Thorsten Czub wrote: >the results together (if a draw is strange to you, it is a crashed >game due to autoplayer-crash and was adjudicated as a draw) >as follows: > >From Tigers point of view: > >+9 -1 =8 for the 40/120 games. > >This gives a standing of 13-5 from 18 for Tiger. >Together with the 2 60/60 games it is 13.5-6.5 for Tiger. >Still a good result. Some remarks: ------------- 1) Game #1 of the 60/60 games, which you rated as a win for Tiger, is a draw. Fritz 6, using it's tablebases, rates this immediately as a draw, as do Nimzo 7.32 and others. 2) Game #2 of the 60/60 games and game #5 of the 40/120 games, which you adjudicated as a draw are no draw at all. I assume, these are the games, in which the autoplayer crashed? In my opinion you shouldn't rate these games, since there is no result at all, these games are totally unclear. 3) In game #10 and #18 I'm not sure about the draw. These games should have been played on, especially considering Fritz's use of the tablebases. 4) In games #2, #6 and #7 I'm not sure about the result. These games should have been played on for some more moves too. You're probably right about these, but I would have preferred to see a clear result here. Nevertheless this is a good performance by Tiger. Which version of Fritz 6 are you using? (Fritz6.eng dated from september or from november?) I don't doubt your results, I'm simply interested. >Next i can post my results tiger-Fritz5.32, more interesting >since fritz5.32 HAS a very precise ELO-rating so far. > >only if you are interested... Yup, I'm very interested! Please post the games too, if possible. Thank you for posting the games, Heiko.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.