Author: Bernhard Bauer
Date: 06:40:48 12/10/99
Go up one level in this thread
On December 10, 1999 at 09:13:50, Enrique Irazoqui wrote:
>On December 10, 1999 at 08:38:29, Bernhard Bauer wrote:
>
>>On December 10, 1999 at 08:22:19, Enrique Irazoqui wrote:
>>
>>>Those are the positions you posted, including Vincent's.
>>>
>>>1k2q/8/4N/8/2Q/3K/8/8 w - -; bm c4c7
>>>2kr4/3b4/8/8/8/8/8/R1KR4 w - -; bm a1a8
>>>4q/p5p/k5P/8/1PN4K/8/1N2B/8 w; bm b4b5
>>>7k/2q3pP/6P1/8/8/8/6Pp/2RR3K/ w - -; bm c1c4
>>>
>>>Running on a PIII-500 with 128MB ht, Tiger solved P1 and P2 in a fraction of a
>>>second; did not solve P3 and solved P4 in 25 seconds.
>>>
>>>Pos 1 Qc7+, 0'', +9 (doesn't see the mate in 13), kept for 15'
>>>
>>>Pos 2 Ra8+, 0'', +6, kept for 15'
>>>
>>>Pos 3 Ne5+, +0.5, b5+ not found in 15 minutes
>>>
>>>Pos 4 Rc4, 25'', +5, kept for 15'
>>>
>>>Enrique
>>
>>Thank you very much for posting the first moves and the times for the
>>above 4 positions. From your post I see that Pos 3 is not solved, however,
>>did Tiger12 solve Pos 1, 2 and 4? You say so, and I can see that Tiger12
>>found the first moves imediatly, but that doesn't necessarily mean that
>>Tiger12 has found the solution. The main line would tell.
>>Would you please be so kind and provide the main lines?
>>
>>Hope you had fun with the positions and as always
>>Kind regards
>>Bernhard
>
>Here you have the lines. Since I wouldn't want to do unforgivable hype, I
>suggest you go buy Tiger in a few weeks and post the lines yourself.
>
>Enrique
>
>[Event "6/90-51 L'Eco degli Scacchi"]
>[Site "?"]
>[Date "1917.??.??"]
>[Round "?"]
>[White "Rinck, H."]
>[Black ")"]
>[Result "1-0"]
>[SetUp "1"]
>[FEN "1k2q3/8/4N3/8/2Q5/3K4/8/8 w - - 0 1"]
>[PlyCount "11"]
>[EventDate "1917.??.??"]
>
>1. Qc7+ Ka8 2. Qa5+ Kb7 (2... Kb8 3. Qb6+ {nebst Matt}) 3. Nc5+ Kb8 (3... Kc8
>4. Qa8+) (3... Kc6 4. Qa4+) 4. Qb6+ Kc8 5. Qb7+ Kd8 6. Kd2 $3 1-0
>
>[Event "tb08"]
>[Site "?"]
>[Date "1923.??.??"]
>[Round "?"]
>[White "Rinck, H."]
>[Black "[+0530.00c1c8]"]
>[Result "1-0"]
>[SetUp "1"]
>[FEN "2kr4/3b4/8/8/8/8/8/R1KR4 w - - 0 1"]
>[PlyCount "5"]
>[EventDate "1923.??.??"]
>
>1. Ra8+ Kc7 2. Ra7+ Kc8 (2... Kc6 3. Rd2) 3. Rd6 1-0
>
>[Event ".ev tt22"]
>[Site "?"]
>[Date "1910.??.??"]
>[Round "?"]
>[White "Platov, V PlatovM"]
>[Black "[+3012.22h4a6]"]
>[Result "1-0"]
>[SetUp "1"]
>[FEN "4q3/p5p1/k5P1/8/1PN4K/8/1N2B3/8 w - - 0 1"]
>[PlyCount "5"]
>[EventDate "1910.??.??"]
>
>1. b5+ Qxb5 $1 2. Nd3 $1 Qxc4+ (2... Qf5 3. Nb4+) (2... Qb1 3. Nc5+) (2... Qb8
>3. Nc5+ Kb5 4. Ne5+) 3. Nf4 1-0
>
>[Event "2.p md01"]
>[Site "?"]
>[Date "1982.??.??"]
>[Round "?"]
>[White "Matous, M."]
>[Black "[+3200.32h1h8]"]
>[Result "1-0"]
>[SetUp "1"]
>[FEN "7k/2q3pP/6P1/8/8/8/6Pp/2RR3K w - - 0 1"]
>[PlyCount "23"]
>[EventDate "1982.??.??"]
>
>1. Rc4 (1. Rc2 $2 Qd7 2. Rf1 Qf5 3. Rf3 (3. Rf4 Qc5 4. Rd4 Qf8 5. Rf4 Qc5) 3...
>Qc5 4. Rff2 Qf5 5. Rf3 Qc5 6. Re3 Qf8 7. Rf3 Qc5) (1. Rc3 $2 Qd7 2. Rd5 (2. Re1
>Qe6 3. Rf1 Qf5) (2. Rd4 Qe8 3. Re4 (3. Re3 Qa8) 3... Qa8 4. Rc1 Qf8 5. Rf4 Qe8)
>2... Qe8 3. Re3 Qf8 4. Rf5 (4. Rf3 Qe8 5. Rf1 Qxg6) 4... Qa8) (1. Rc5 $2 Qd7 2.
>Rd4 (2. Re1 Qe6) 2... Qe8 3. Re4 Qa8 4. Rc1 Qf8 5. Rf4 Qa8 6. Rf3 (6. Re4 Qf8)
>6... Qe8) (1. Rc6 $2 Qd7 2. Re1 Qe6 3. Rf1 Qf5) (1. Ra1 $2 Qa5) 1... Qd7 (1...
>Qb8 2. Rf1 (2. Re1 $2 Qa8 3. Rc6 Qf8) 2... Qa8 3. Re4) 2. Rd5 (2. Rf1 $2 Qf5) (
>2. Re1 $2 Qc6 3. Ree4 Qa8 4. Rc1 Qf8 5. Rf4 Qe8 6. Rcf1 Qxg6) (2. Rd2 $2 Qe8 3.
>Re4 Qa8 4. Rd1 Qf8 5. Rf4 Qe8) (2. Rdd4 $2 Qe8 3. Re4 Qa8 4. Rc1 Qf8 5. Rf4 Qe8
>) (2. Rd6 $2 Qe8 3. Re4 Qf8) 2... Qc7 (2... Qe8 3. Re4 Qa8 (3... Qxg6 4. Rd8+
>Kxh7 5. Rh4+) 4. Re1 Qf8 5. Rf5 Qa8 6. Rf3 Qb8 7. Rff1 Qa8 8. Re4) 3. Rf5 (3.
>Rd6 $2 Qd7 4. Re4 Qc8 5. Re1 Qf8) (3. Rc6 $2 Qb8 4. Rb6 Qf8 5. Rf5 Qa8) (3. Re5
>$2 Qb8 4. Rc1 (4. Re1 Qa8) (4. Rb5 Qa8) 4... Qf8) 3... Qc5 (3... Qb8 4. Rf1 (4.
>Rc1 $2 Qe8) 4... Qa8 5. Re4) 4. Rf2 Qf5 5. Re4 Qc8 6. Re1 (6. Rf1 $2 Qa8) 6...
>Qa8 7. Rf3 Qb8 8. Rff1 (8. Ref1 $2 Qf4) 8... Qa8 9. Re4 Qb8 10. Re7 Qa8 11. Rb7
>Qc8 12. Rbf7 1-0
Thank you very much for posting the complete solutions and even the sources.
As three of the above positions were printed in a local news paper without
giving the sources. I'm glad to see the names of the authors now.
BTW, very nice output. Looks very good for analysis purposes. Was your output
generated by Tiger12? Eh'm in a few weaks we will know.
And last, it's not the beta testers task to make buying suggestions, because
they are completely independent, aren't they?
Kind regards
bernhard
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.