Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 08:52:48 12/10/99
Go up one level in this thread
On December 10, 1999 at 11:25:58, Charles Unruh wrote:
I prefer 20 GMs 40 in 2 against DIEP rather than against Rebel.
Rebel has already had 18 years time to proof itselve against GMs.
>I wonder is it possible that Once we get 20 games of GM's against Rebel at 40/2
>(there also seems to be a good number of master and GM games vs Junior)that we
>can then recalculate/readjust the ratings of the ssdf by first calculating the
>ratings of other comps vs Rebel(with the calculated rating from it's 20 games.).
> In fact We should certainly be able to find a few masters who are willing to
>play Rebel or any comp at 40/2 over a few weeks period to go ahead and get a new
>base rating for some progs to bring the SSDF back into line with Fide ratings as
>an attempt to put this GM issue or should i say (2500 fide rating issue) to bed,
>and show i was totally right once and for all :)!
I'm open for any player who wants to. Just go to icc, and match diep.
not very much humans play at slow time controls.
But about rating against humans of DIEP:
secret: (dual 550 linux)
Standard 2614 1763 375 184 2322 2663 (02-May-1999)
moron: (dual 550 nt, but also allowing computers to play it)
Standard 2612 574 235 163 972 2676 (21-Nov-1999)
judgeturpin: (pii266)
Standard 2419 859 389 187 1435 2523 (19-Sep-1999)
secret and moron allow humans above 2200 standard to play it.
moron allows everyone/everything above 2000 to play it at standard.
Biggest rating influences are small things like:
- diep seems to have a bug in contempt factor (seems to use 0 always)
- book, humans get computer in a sideline after which the automatic
generated book plays a big crap move.
Vincent
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.