Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: New rating list based upon Human games /SSDF brought back into line

Author: Bertil Eklund

Date: 16:32:06 12/10/99

Go up one level in this thread


On December 10, 1999 at 11:52:48, Vincent Diepeveen wrote:

>On December 10, 1999 at 11:25:58, Charles Unruh wrote:
>
>I prefer 20 GMs 40 in 2 against DIEP rather than against Rebel.
>Rebel has already had 18 years time to proof itselve against GMs.
>
>>I wonder is it possible that Once we get 20 games of GM's against Rebel at 40/2
>>(there also seems to be a good number of master and GM games vs Junior)that we
>>can then recalculate/readjust the ratings of the ssdf by first calculating the
>>ratings of other comps vs Rebel(with the calculated rating from it's 20 games.).
>> In fact We should certainly be able to find a few masters who are willing to
>>play Rebel or any comp at 40/2 over a few weeks period to go ahead and get a new
>>base rating for some progs to bring the SSDF back into line with Fide ratings as
>>an attempt to put this GM issue or should i say (2500 fide rating issue) to bed,
>>and show i was totally right once and for all :)!
>
>I'm open for any player who wants to. Just go to icc, and match diep.
>not very much humans play at slow time controls.
>
>But about rating against humans of DIEP:
> secret: (dual 550 linux)
>  Standard    2614       1763   375   184  2322   2663 (02-May-1999)
>
> moron: (dual 550 nt, but also allowing computers to play it)
>  Standard    2612        574   235   163   972   2676 (21-Nov-1999)
>
> judgeturpin: (pii266)
>  Standard    2419        859   389   187  1435   2523 (19-Sep-1999)
>
>secret and moron allow humans above 2200 standard to play it.
>moron allows everyone/everything above 2000 to play it at standard.
>
>Biggest rating influences are small things like:
>  - diep seems to have a bug in contempt factor (seems to use 0 always)
>  - book, humans get computer in a sideline after which the automatic
>    generated book plays  a big crap move.
>
>Vincent

Hi!

Excuse me for a rudimentary question, but what time is included in standard?
I am very impressed with your results in standard time-control.

Bertil



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.