Author: James T. Walker
Date: 06:18:35 12/12/99
Go up one level in this thread
On December 12, 1999 at 01:30:48, Jeff Anderson wrote: >I am an 18 year old chess player with a USCF rating right around 1700. I've >been playing chess for two and a half years now. I believe that computer chess >programs have caused serious faults in my ability to analyze. When I see people >analyzing a position, for example in the post mortem of a game, they usually do >it very well and see a lot of ideas and tactics, even though they are much lower >than me, yet I am overwhelmed. When I sit down in to annotate one of my games I > cannot possibly do it without my computer. When I try, I end up giving up and >thinking to myself, "What's the point. A computer would find better lines in a >fraction of a second." I, as young as many young chess players, will have a >difficulty analyzing because of a dependence on computer chess programs. >I believe an increased dependence on computer chess programs for analysis has >hurt my over the board play, and will hurt the over the board play. Nearly all >of the experts and masters I know rarely if ever use a computer chess program. >If they had used them when they were still class players, I doubt they would >have progressed to expert or master. Hello Jeff, I have several questions for you. Who is teaching you to play? Do you read many books on chess and the theory behind the openings? How much time do you spend studying chess per week? Just playing chess will usually not allow you to develop very far. The computer is a great tool and a willing opponent when you want to play but very few of them teach chess unless you have the proper programs. Learning chess is just like going to school, you have to study to improve. Jim Walker
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.