Author: Georg v. Zimmermann
Date: 13:40:50 12/13/99
Go up one level in this thread
On December 13, 1999 at 16:13:46, Jeroen van Dorp wrote: >How about a third accomplice, looking at the game and using a mobile phone or >two empty cans with a string tied between? (hold tight, or else transmission is >bad) > >Or is that too low tech? > >Jeroen ;-} > >Can you imagine, talking into a little mike behind the board, and then halfway >lousy communications? > >Allwermann (mumbling) >Opponent: "What is that?" >Allwermann: "Sorry, nothing" >Opponent: "Oh" (moves) >Allwerman (whispering): "Knight to e4" >Opponent: "Huh?" >Allwermann: "Nothing, just confirming your move" >Opponent: "Yeah, I see" >Allwermann: "No you fool, not Queen but Knight to e4!" >Opponent": "Yes, I know... >Allwermann: "Shut up, I wasn't talking to you" >Opponent: "Sorry" >Allwerman (raising his voice in anger): "I don't care what Fritz says!! Knight >to e4!!" >Opponent: "Fritz who?" >Allwerman(read headed): "Did I ask you something, bozo?" >Opponent (to the side, whispering to others:) "Is that drug testing thing >already accorded by FIDE?" hehe lol. GREAT dialogue! I agree that a camera makes more sense. Or use sensors in shoe like those guys who cheated at Roulette. Georg
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.