Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Question for Dr. Robert Hyatt

Author: paul bedrey

Date: 15:13:40 12/13/99

Go up one level in this thread


On December 13, 1999 at 16:59:00, Robert Hyatt wrote:

>On December 13, 1999 at 16:23:43, John Warfield wrote:
>
>>On December 13, 1999 at 15:09:09, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>>
>>>On December 13, 1999 at 14:58:30, walter irvin wrote:
>>>
>>>>On December 12, 1999 at 20:40:46, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On December 12, 1999 at 17:24:52, John Warfield wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Could you please tell me what your 2450 projection is for, on what machine?
>>>>>>Also I am curious what you would rate the best computer programs on these
>>>>>>platforms  1. Amd 600  2. Amd 300  3 MMX 200
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Thanks
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>I think the best of today's programs, on the best of today's hardware, is
>>>>>playing at a 2450 (roughly) level (FIDE rating).  I don't think cutting the
>>>>>hardware speed by a factor of 2, nor doubling the hardware speed, would make
>>>>>any significant change...  The problem is that the programs are good tactically,
>>>>>but have significant positional holes that speed won't help.
>>>>>
>>>>>I think programs will continue to improve, but only as those 'holes' are
>>>>>covered up solidly...
>>>>
>>>>For what it's worth I think you are 100% correct. Depending on the program the speed of the processor plays the most important part in the current ratings increase. This is to be expected since computers rely on tactics. I would expect
program A on a faster computer to beat the same version on a slower machine.

I once had the bright idea of creating a book of my favorite anti-computer
opening(Stonewall Attack) in a very respected commercial program. Once out of
book I was appalled at the program's move selection. It was obvious the program
did not understand the continuation of the attack. This leads to a question.
Would a program benefit from an understanding of specific opening(such as king
or queenside attack, or key stratigic squares for specific pieces) OR would this
slow the program down too much? I know this is hypothetical but as one of the
leading chess programmers your opinion is worth more than mine.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.