Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 13:23:22 12/14/99
Go up one level in this thread
On December 14, 1999 at 14:32:23, Chris Carson wrote:
>On December 14, 1999 at 14:23:50, Tom Kerrigan wrote:
>
>>You posted this a few days ago, and evidently ignored all the responses.
>>
>>The upshot is that the G4 is not that great. A fast Intel chip can stomp all
>>over it.
>>
>>-Tom
>>
>>On December 14, 1999 at 13:47:58, ERIQ wrote:
>>
>>>I really don't think any other program has a chance not
>>>even rebel-tiger. the combination of hardware and software is too strong.
>>>but I'm sure those win box lovers would never give it a shot.
>>>
>>> sign,
>>> Eriq
>
>Here is the specint95 for Mac (AMD and others also listed):
>http://macspeedzone.com/4.0/WinvsMacSPECint.html
>
>Top Intel (listed) is PIII 7333 with specint95 is 35.7 about twice
>the G4-400. See www.intel.com.
From:
http://www.specbench.org/osg/cpu95/results/cpu95.html
We have:
CINT95 Rates
Company System Result
Baseline # CPU Disclosure
Alpha Processor, UP2000 667 MHz 4MB Windows NT 288 288
1 HTML Text PS
CFP95 Rates
Company System Result
Baseline # CPU Disclosure
Alpha Processor, UP2000 667 MHz 4MB Windows NT 478 436
1 HTML Text PS
So if we are allowed to discuss expensive single CPU machines, we can get some
fairly impressive results.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.