Author: J. Wesley Cleveland
Date: 16:19:59 12/14/99
Go up one level in this thread
On December 14, 1999 at 17:13:17, KarinsDad wrote: >On December 13, 1999 at 16:40:50, Georg v. Zimmermann wrote: > >[snip] >> >>hehe lol. GREAT dialogue! I agree that a camera makes more sense. Or use sensors >>in shoe like those guys who cheated at Roulette. >> >>Georg > >A camera sends too much data and the chance of getting caught is too high. > >I prefer the pen and the hidden ear plug. From 1 to 8 pushes on the end of the >pen, a 3 second pause, from 1 to 8 pushes, a 3 second pause, from 1 to 8 pushes, >a 3 second pause, from 1 to 8 pushes. The pushes would be faint (i.e. no click >associated with them). The pen sends the 12 bits just entered, the accomplice >sends back the move to ensure it is correct. A single push for yes, three pushes >for no. Look out James Bond. We have better gadgets than you! How about a digital pen that transmits movements while it writes. That way he just records the moves and his accomplice reads them off the screen.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.