Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Allwermann Accomplice theory and the grassy knoll

Author: Charles Unruh

Date: 16:34:19 12/14/99

Go up one level in this thread


On December 14, 1999 at 19:19:59, J. Wesley Cleveland wrote:

>On December 14, 1999 at 17:13:17, KarinsDad wrote:
>
>>On December 13, 1999 at 16:40:50, Georg v. Zimmermann wrote:
>>
>>[snip]
>>>
>>>hehe lol. GREAT dialogue! I agree that a camera makes more sense. Or use sensors
>>>in shoe like those guys who cheated at Roulette.
>>>
>>>Georg
>>
>>A camera sends too much data and the chance of getting caught is too high.
>>
>>I prefer the pen and the hidden ear plug. From 1 to 8 pushes on the end of the
>>pen, a 3 second pause, from 1 to 8 pushes, a 3 second pause, from 1 to 8 pushes,
>>a 3 second pause, from 1 to 8 pushes. The pushes would be faint (i.e. no click
>>associated with them). The pen sends the 12 bits just entered, the accomplice
>>sends back the move to ensure it is correct. A single push for yes, three pushes
>>for no. Look out James Bond. We have better gadgets than you!
>
>How about a digital pen that transmits movements while it writes. That way he
>just records the moves and his accomplice reads them off the screen.

Hello Q, James here, i need some more of those X-ray glasses and also include
rocket blow dart on that pin so i can shoot my opponent at the board without
anyone noticing.

 Thanks 007


P.S this message is set to self destruct



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.