Author: Dave Gomboc
Date: 13:08:26 12/16/99
Go up one level in this thread
On December 16, 1999 at 15:19:01, Greg Lindahl wrote: >Don't get caught up in the straw-man argument here -- there's no reason that >someone using FPGAs would not put functions on the FPGA more suitable for FPGAs. >Things have changed since DB: processors are faster, the busses have higher >bandwidth and lower latency (DB was MCA, yes?), the interconnect I use is only >as fast as DB's IBM SP (albeit with lower latency). These factors all mean that >a different design is likely. DB was VME. That's what the RS/6000 host uses. Dave
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.