Author: Daniel Clausen
Date: 15:21:27 12/16/99
Go up one level in this thread
Hi On December 16, 1999 at 16:06:08, Dan Homan wrote: >That's a real problem. Maybe the way to say it without defining intelligence >is "computers can preform well at tasks that require intelligence for humans, >chess for example". This leaves the conclusions about intelligence up to the >reader. And what exactly do you win by this? Now people will fight what tasks require intelligence for humans. :) Does driving a car for example require intelligence? Looking at the number of people who actually have a driving license one could tend to answer this question with 'not really' at least. :) I think the definition of intelligence you posted some messages ago is the best one so far. Being able to learn and act reasonably in situation you never saw before. (not your exact wording) Kind regards, -sargon
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.