Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Game in one second -- "@ their strongest settings..."

Author: Dann Corbit

Date: 19:55:01 12/16/99

Go up one level in this thread


On December 16, 1999 at 22:33:16, Albert Silver wrote:

>On December 16, 1999 at 17:30:14, robert michelena wrote:
>[snip]
>>However, like the lonely scientist who stated that the world is indeed round,
>>and not square, as all those around him cried, I will continue to state what I
>>consider to be a fundamental truth: non grandmasters cannot beat commercial
>>programs at their strongest settings.
>>
>>The world is round.
>
>Been there, done that. Funny, I Don't remember being a GM though. Have to
>remember to ask FIDE why they are holding out on me.
>
>                                       Albert Silver
>
>The world is flat I tell you.
Perhaps we are not giving RM the benefit of the doubt here.  Let's look
*carefully* at his statement:
"I will continue to state what I consider to be a fundamental truth: non
grandmasters cannot beat commercial programs at their strongest settings."

Now, we will imagine that we have some pretty darn clever IM's facing a
computer.  What will they fear the most?  SHORT TIME CONTROL.  Now, let's expand
it further.  What is the most frightening of all?  The shortest time setting of
all.  So, imagine a computer that can think 3 plies and move in a millisecond.
Clearly _against people_ that *is* the strongest setting.  Time control of 40/2
or longer is the _weakest_ setting against people.  So the computer's
_strongest_ setting is probably "game in one second."
Since no human can possibly keep up, RM may _in fact_ be right.

Surely, he has been harboring this secret thought and will reveal it to us
shortly.
;-)





This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.