Author: Greg Lindahl
Date: 21:36:08 12/16/99
Go up one level in this thread
On December 16, 1999 at 21:08:16, Robert Hyatt wrote: >But you are going about it wrong. First step: enumerate _all_ the problems >that have to be solved... And then you go on to wonder why on earth I feel that I have been personally attacked? I am "naieve" (over something I didn't propose) and "going about it all wrong" (for asking "who's interested?"). Heck, I'm trained as a scientist and I'm quite used to blunt discussions, but this is a bit much. BTW, I can't enumerate all the problems, because I have no idea what they are. I'm on step 0 of the process, and you want to be on step 1. Also BTW, the FPGA problem you (and others) recount is probably why most FPGA PCI cards come with sram on the card. >IE if I am going to build a robot to perform surgery, I am _definitely_ going to >listen to a MD that explains certain very tedius things that must be done right, Which is why I asked who was interested in the problem. It's a simple question. I'm in private discussions with a couple of people about this project, and I assure you that I'm listening very carefully, and find what they have to say very educational. I would probably find what you have to say useful, if you wanted to talk about something other than the straw-man entire-algorithm- on-fpga approach, which I doubt fits the resources of anyone but IBM. -- greg
This page took 0.02 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.