Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: MOD: Tone it down please...this post is not admissible as evidence.

Author: Jeroen van Dorp

Date: 02:57:49 12/17/99

Go up one level in this thread


On December 16, 1999 at 19:34:28, robert michelena wrote:

>There is no proof that the "person" on the other end was using his brain or his
>program.

You can answer as long as you like that "it's not true" but your ignoring of the
facts does *not* change reality, sadly enough.


And besides, there's a slight problem: *YOU* have to prove you're right, not the
reverse.
If you state something that fanatically, prove it.
You can't disprove it by letting the accused party prove it's innocence.

The communist countries did that in court with anybody who wasn't acclaiming
their being right.

(Hey, didn't I already said something about communist theory and white and black
swans? Robert? Are you our own communist revival conspiracy on CCC - Communist
Chess Center? :))

Jeroen ;-}



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.