Author: Enrique Irazoqui
Date: 03:28:10 12/17/99
Go up one level in this thread
On December 17, 1999 at 06:04:27, robert michelena wrote: >Jerome, as a third year law student, I was only pointing out what to me is self >evident; these assertions that the player on the other end of the internet >connection used brain power to defeat a program would not be admissible in any >court of law as valid evidence. We call it hearsay. > >Until someone post proof that an "average player" (non master strength; national >master and international master and above ) defeated a program over the board >without aid from any source, I deem all assertions as suspect at best. > >As for the communist dialectic, it seems to me that I am the victim of those >exhibiting fanatical "party directed" zeal. Yesterday I gave you the scores of 2 games played at Aegon, a man-computer tournament played in Holland with players that are physically present, together with arbiters, programmers, public, you name it. These 2 games were won by 2 under 2000 people against Shredder and Genius. Games at Aegon have been always played at slow time control. My question is not your suspicions, your persecution by fanatics, but why do I bother answering to this crap. Enrique
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.