Author: Torstein Hall
Date: 07:04:46 12/17/99
Go up one level in this thread
On December 17, 1999 at 08:37:19, walter irvin wrote: >i think AI should be anything that can defeat more than 75% of the time a random >action .in other words humans could be put to the test as well as computers .if >a computer program can score at least 75% out of a 100 games vs totaly random >moves then you must say that it has demonstrated AI .now the degree of AI or how >good something is i guess you could take the average rating for the average >person and compare vs the program and there you are . I think chess is a skill, not proof of intelligence. The proof of intelligence is when you change the rules and the system can adapt the new rules. In my view a chessprogram is closer to a mechanic system than intelligence! Torstein
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.