Author: walter irvin
Date: 14:33:06 12/17/99
Go up one level in this thread
On December 17, 1999 at 10:04:46, Torstein Hall wrote: >On December 17, 1999 at 08:37:19, walter irvin wrote: > >>i think AI should be anything that can defeat more than 75% of the time a random >>action .in other words humans could be put to the test as well as computers .if >>a computer program can score at least 75% out of a 100 games vs totaly random >>moves then you must say that it has demonstrated AI .now the degree of AI or how >>good something is i guess you could take the average rating for the average >>person and compare vs the program and there you are . > > >I think chess is a skill, not proof of intelligence. The proof of intelligence >is when you change the rules and the system can adapt the new rules. In my view >a chessprogram is closer to a mechanic system than intelligence! > >Torstein chess is only the work of the mind not body .chess programs out think most humans at chess .the human mind is programed to play chess , it just so happens the human mind is programed to do lots other things . the difference between human thought and computer thought are getting closer and closer .eventually the human will tell the computer to write him a program to play chess and the computer will do it .the problem will come when the computer tells us to do something and we do it .that day when computer has total control will happen , if man is not scared of the A bomb he will not fear computers .already when someone has a chess problem the first thing they do is punch the problem into a computer .just doing that says you trust the judgement of the computer more than yourself!!even GM's do that .eventually people will trust the computer's judgement in other areas .
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.