Author: Greg Lindahl
Date: 15:14:27 12/17/99
Go up one level in this thread
On December 17, 1999 at 12:15:04, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On December 17, 1999 at 00:36:08, Greg Lindahl wrote: > >>On December 16, 1999 at 21:08:16, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>>But you are going about it wrong. First step: enumerate _all_ the problems >>>that have to be solved... >> >>And then you go on to wonder why on earth I feel that I have been personally >>attacked? I am "naieve" (over something I didn't propose) and "going about it >>all wrong" (for asking "who's interested?"). Heck, I'm trained as a scientist >>and I'm quite used to blunt discussions, but this is a bit much. >> > >First _I_ didn't say "naive". Second, I didn't say you are "going about it >all wrong". Someone else said "naive". What you said is quoted above, for all to read. > I pointed >out some serious issues that _must_ be solved for this to fly. Incorrect. If the FPGA design doesn't need any memory, then no one needs to solve the problem of getting memory in an FPGA. You pointed out a straw man. >Certainly... But you started with the idea of a single-chip engine. I did not. You act as if my mention of some technology issues was like I had decreed a design. That's the very straw man you continue to talk about. If you're going to discuss a straw man, quit claiming I proposed it. This point is not very complex. I'm surprised you continue to post again and again about it. -- greg
This page took 0.02 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.