Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: new computer chess effort

Author: Eugene Nalimov

Date: 15:59:56 12/17/99

Go up one level in this thread


On December 17, 1999 at 18:14:27, Greg Lindahl wrote:

>On December 17, 1999 at 12:15:04, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>
[deleted]

>> I pointed
>>out some serious issues that _must_ be solved for this to fly.
>
>Incorrect. If the FPGA design doesn't need any memory, then no one needs to
>solve the problem of getting memory in an FPGA. You pointed out a straw man.

Yes, but Bob wrote exactly why memory is the necessity, and you did not explain
how you plain to avoid using it. You can waive your hands in the air as long as
you wish; but when it comes down to technical details, I'd recommend you to
listen to others, who have some experience in that area (especially Bob). Yes,
Bob is often harsh - he teaches students, and it's not easy for him to turn off
his "mentor tone". But he has a lot of computer chess experience, including "big
iron" one - and it's very rare here.

Eugene



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.