Author: Steve
Date: 19:39:40 12/17/99
Go up one level in this thread
On December 17, 1999 at 06:04:27, robert michelena wrote: >Jerome, as a third year law student, I was only pointing out what to me is self >evident; these assertions that the player on the other end of the internet >connection used brain power to defeat a program would not be admissible in any >court of law as valid evidence. We call it hearsay. > >Until someone post proof that an "average player" (non master strength; national >master and international master and above ) defeated a program over the board >without aid from any source, I deem all assertions as suspect at best. > >As for the communist dialectic, it seems to me that I am the victim of those >exhibiting fanatical "party directed" zeal. It's a free country, and if you want to make obnoxious, unsupported assertions, go right ahead. But, speaking as a practicing attorney, I ask that you at least refrain from identifying yourself as a potential member of the profession. We have enough image problems already.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.