Author: Tom Kerrigan
Date: 04:16:49 12/18/99
Go up one level in this thread
I agree with this. Just because you post on the Computer Chess Club doesn't mean you're an idiot. Bob is obviously an expert at computer chess and he has significant experience with the specialized hardware involved. I wouldn't say that I'm an expert at hardware, but I have been studying digital logic for the past two years and I know a thing or two about it. Meanwhile, I'm not sure Greg can draw a schematic of _any_ PLA block... much less know why they would/wouldn't work for particular algorithms... -Tom On December 17, 1999 at 18:59:56, Eugene Nalimov wrote: >On December 17, 1999 at 18:14:27, Greg Lindahl wrote: > >>On December 17, 1999 at 12:15:04, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >[deleted] > >>> I pointed >>>out some serious issues that _must_ be solved for this to fly. >> >>Incorrect. If the FPGA design doesn't need any memory, then no one needs to >>solve the problem of getting memory in an FPGA. You pointed out a straw man. > >Yes, but Bob wrote exactly why memory is the necessity, and you did not explain >how you plain to avoid using it. You can waive your hands in the air as long as >you wish; but when it comes down to technical details, I'd recommend you to >listen to others, who have some experience in that area (especially Bob). Yes, >Bob is often harsh - he teaches students, and it's not easy for him to turn off >his "mentor tone". But he has a lot of computer chess experience, including "big >iron" one - and it's very rare here. > >Eugene
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.