Author: Paulo Soares
Date: 13:39:59 12/18/99
Go up one level in this thread
On December 18, 1999 at 10:58:37, Georg v. Zimmermann wrote: >about 2100 strength in e-mail games if you let a fast computer run for the whole >time it has per move (instead of normal correspondence-amalyses by a human). It >is not even _close_ to titled players strength. >I know someone who is currently playing in the correspondence world championship >who says that he won a few games because of computers ... because of his >opponents believe too much what their computers tell them. > >That is what I'm trying to say for months: a computer might well be 2500 playing >strength, but it has more than 300 elo points less analyzing strength. > >Regards, >Georg v. Zimmermann > >P.S. >Keep in mind: I can use a computer to help me analyze a position,. a computer >can't just ask me for my oppinion if he wants to know it. I am amazed. A player that is playng in the correspondence world championship should have enough experience for not believe in computers. The computer is a powerful tool for the correspondence games, but it is necessary to know how to use it. I would like to see those games, could you put it here? Paulo Soares, from Brazil
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.