Author: Greg Lindahl
Date: 12:48:35 12/20/99
Go up one level in this thread
On December 17, 1999 at 18:59:56, Eugene Nalimov wrote: >Yes, but Bob wrote exactly why memory is the necessity, and you did not explain >how you plain to avoid using it. Bob explained why memory was a necessity if you wanted to exactly replicate Deep Blue's chips. He did not consider either (1) FPGA cards with SRAMs, which are common, or (2) whether it's best to put as much into the FPGA as Deep Blue does. That's why I was disappointed with his comments. > You can waive your hands in the air as long as >you wish; but when it comes down to technical details, I'd recommend you to >listen to others I am happy to listen to others. I have been listening to others. I just don't think that a discussion about something that I don't think is a good idea anyway (due to 2) and that is fairly moot (due to 1) is worthwhile.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.