Author: Greg Lindahl
Date: 21:29:33 12/20/99
Go up one level in this thread
On December 20, 1999 at 21:34:15, Robert Hyatt wrote: >Depends. But if you don't pass the repetition list, then you aren't planning >on doing an 'engine in hardware'. Hello? I've said repeatedly that I wasn't planning on doing what you claimed I was; that's what the entire thread about "straw men" was about. >As I said before, if you don't put the _entire_ engine on the board, then the >speedup is not going to be particularly attractive. And as I said before, I disagree with your assumptions behind your claim. >So instead of bantying words, exactly _what_ are you suggesting putting on this >FPGA-based board? I've said repeatedly that I don't yet know. However, I have pointed out that an engine which spends 90% of its time doing evaluation might be able to get away with just putting evaluation on an FPGA-based board. I have no idea if that's the right idea. And no, I haven't been "bantying words". -- g
This page took 0.02 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.