Author: Greg Lindahl
Date: 21:42:38 12/20/99
Go up one level in this thread
On December 20, 1999 at 21:52:01, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>There is no reason why you have to assume that you must have the move generator >>or alpha/beta search on the FPGA. That assumption underlies Bob's claims about >>feasability, and my complaint that there's more than one way to skin a cat. >> >>I would love to see a discussion about the minimum useful stuff on an FPGA, but >>of course that depends on how your engine is written, and Bob's engine spends >>relatively little time in eval. >> >>-- g > > >Again, that statement is simply wrong. 50% of the time is spent in the eval. >That is more than any other single component by a wide margin. In my book, 50% is "relatively little time in eval", especially when I'm comparing it to an engine which spends 90% in eval. -- g
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.