Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 06:24:29 12/21/99
Go up one level in this thread
On December 21, 1999 at 08:49:08, Albert Silver wrote: >On December 21, 1999 at 02:05:54, Greg Lindahl wrote: > >>On December 21, 1999 at 01:39:44, Dann Corbit wrote: >> >>>>You are assuming that it's needlessly inefficient? Why? >>> >>>Experience with those I have seen only. >> >>Ah. So you don't know if the program I am referring to is inefficient just >>because it spends 90% of its time in eval. So, nothing much learned, except that >>you know that sometimes that means something bad. >> >>You can probably assume that anyone thinking about sending an eval to silicon >>would make sure it's reasonably optimized first. 2 approaches: - running it in software before putting it to hardware - using hardware that's reprogrammable for testing >>-- g > >So what engine uses 90% of its time on the eval? I'm curious. Mine is. And that 90% is just the full eval which is getting used in 40% of the cases. In 60% of the cases i'm getting the eval out of hashtables. > Albert Silver
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.