Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 12:04:54 12/21/99
Go up one level in this thread
On December 21, 1999 at 13:12:28, Albert Silver wrote: >On December 21, 1999 at 12:03:05, Amir Ban wrote: > >>On December 21, 1999 at 09:54:39, blass uri wrote: >> >>>On December 21, 1999 at 06:58:26, Amir Ban wrote: >>> >>>>I believe there are engines that take 90% for eval, but I'm pretty sure that no >>>>first-rank engine does. This means that you have 10% left for all the rest, and >>>>you have at least a 5-to-1 handicap in search speed against other engines. >>>>There's no way to successfully compete with this kind of handicap. >>> >>>I guess that hiarcs7.32 use something close to 90% for eval. >>>I think that it succesfully compete with this kind of handicap. >>> >> >>No way. > >No way it is using close to 90% for the eval, or no way it is successfully >competing with this kind of handicap? I presume you meant the first, since >Hiarcs's successes speak for themselves. How much time do you think it spends on >the eval? > > Albert Silver > >> >>Amir I would guess 50%. I think the rest of the time is spent in the selective search...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.