Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Partial apology

Author: Dann Corbit

Date: 16:10:57 12/21/99

Go up one level in this thread


On December 21, 1999 at 18:47:17, Dann Corbit wrote:

>The following messages:
>
>*  83649
>*  83675
>*  83652
>*  83667
>*  83672
>
>Were of questionable legal status.  I am not taking sides in the controversy and
>have no idea which parties may or not be at fault.  In any case, this forum is
>not the place to make accusations to bolster position.
>
>One (common sense) thought for future agreements for any sort of persons:
>Get what you want in writing.  That way *NEITHER* party will be surprised about
>what is expected or the legal terms involved.

I stand by my remark that a written contract is a good idea for business
transactions.  However, I do apologize if it appears that I am criticizing
either party in the [deleted] dispute.  I do not have any special knowlege of
their business dealings and (quite frankly) it is none of my business.




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.