Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: FPGAs playing chess--an expert opinion

Author: Tom Kerrigan

Date: 12:50:06 12/22/99

Go up one level in this thread


On December 22, 1999 at 10:20:03, Albert Silver wrote:
>The question begs asking so I'll ask it: If you were to try to build the next
>super duper ultra chess machine, and provided costs were not the biggest issue,
>how would you go about it? How would you pick up from Deep Blue? I realize this
>is completely hypothetical, and that any ideas you had would still need to bear
>testing, but the question remains: what would you do?

Using a newer process to make the chips is a pretty clear win. 0.6 micron to
0.18 micron is a big jump. It's the difference between the Pentium Pro and the
Coppermine. If money isn't an issue, I bet you can get ~8 of the original DB
chips on one 0.18 micron die.

After that, there's the usual tweaking that people have been doing to chess
programs for years and years. I'm sure their evaluation function could use some
work. Testing null move would definitely be interesting.

-Tom



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.