Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 15:37:16 12/22/99
Go up one level in this thread
On December 22, 1999 at 17:38:27, José de Jesús García Ruvalcaba wrote: >On December 21, 1999 at 17:44:06, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >[big snip] >> >>Also, chess is _far_ from "embarassingly parallel". It is one of the more >>difficult-to-program parallel algorithms, because alpha/beta is a strictly >>defined sequential algorithm. Doing it in parallel invites a lot of extra >>work that can't be avoided. >> >[big snip] > > I was just about to begin a new thread asking "is there a quick and dirty way >of parallelizing a chess search?". By your post I guess that the answer is "no". >José. There are "quick and dirty" ways to do it. But they don't produce what would be called stellar performance... unfortunately... :)
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.