Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Computer-Chess effort -- another opinion

Author: Dann Corbit

Date: 17:43:10 12/22/99

Go up one level in this thread


On December 22, 1999 at 20:17:47, Greg Lindahl wrote:
>On December 22, 1999 at 10:44:38, Albert Silver wrote:
>>But this is in complete contradiction with what he initially said:
>>
>>"BTW, I wasn't intending to get into a discussion about the proposal here. I was
>>asking for volunteers."
>
>Clue: I said that because I was trying to stop the gang-flaming I was getting
>from people who were attacking a straw-man.
>
>Then I gave up on that, and I started both listening and trying to ensure that
>people stopped claiming they were refuting my position when I really don't have
>a position.
>
>Now I'm a liar for it.
>
>This group was founded to be a better forum than Usenet. In this case, it's far
>worse.

Look, I think we *ALL* got off on the wrong foot on this one.  Why don't we all
just wipe the slate clean and start over.

Hi.  My name is Dann.  I understand you have an interesting idea for creating
chess engines using FPGA's and a large cluster of cheap hardware components.
Why don't you tell us more about it, and perhaps give us some background on the
technology that *you* offer.  Likely, we have not heard of it before.  Then,
perhaps, you can tell us where your deepest lack of information is and we may be
able to help.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.