Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 17:00:48 12/24/99
Go up one level in this thread
On December 24, 1999 at 18:39:00, blass uri wrote: >On December 24, 1999 at 17:17:01, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > >>00:25 391314 (0) 8 -0.48 c2-c4 Qd8-h4 g2-g3 f4xg3 f2xg3 Rg6xg3 Nd5-f6 Ke8-e7 Qd1 >>-e1 Rg3-h3 >This line shows that it does not see it for the right reasons. remember, the lines are from hashtable and it's a fail low, obviously fail low doesn't show the correct line. >After c4 Qh4 g3 the right move for black is Qh3 and not f4xg3 > >The line f4xg3 f2xg3 Rg6xg3 is not clearly winning for black and I guess that >deep thought expected this line when it played c4. >White can continue Qe1 Rh3 Qxh4 Rxh4 cxb5 and the question if g3 is better is a >positional question and not a tactical question. > >The evaluation of programs after f4xg3 are less than 1 pawn for black. >c4 is a tactical blunder not because of this line but because of the line with >Qh3 Right. It just already sees something that's evil enough. Very likely not this line, but something that has to do with Qh3. We're just needing a bound that's it. Then we get a fail low. >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.