Author: Vincent Lejeune
Date: 05:26:21 12/26/99
Go up one level in this thread
On December 26, 1999 at 03:26:08, blass uri wrote:
>On December 25, 1999 at 19:43:35, Chris Taylor wrote:
>
>
><snipped>
>
>
>>[Event "Level=Blitz:90'. "]
>>[Site "Notts"]
>>[Date "1999.12.25"]
>>[Round "6"]
>>[White "Rebel Century"]
>>[Black "Junior 6.0"]
>>[Result "1-0"]
>>[ECO "B50"]
>>[Annotator "-0.07"]
>>[PlyCount "68"]
>>[EventDate "1999.11.29"]
>>
>>{87039kB, Jbook.ctg. K6_350
>>} 1. e4 {0} 1... c5 {1} 2. Nf3 {1} 2... d6 {0} 3.
>>c3 {1} 3... Nf6 {0} 4. Be2 {1} 4... Nbd7 {0} 5. d3 {1} 5... b6 {0} 6. O-O {2}
>>6... Bb7 {0} 7. Nbd2 {2} 7... g6 {0} 8. d4 {2} 8... cxd4 {0} 9. cxd4 {2} 9...
>>Nxe4 {last book move -0.07/17 177} 10. Nxe4 {2} 10... Bxe4 {-0.08/15 84} 11.
>>Ng5 {2} 11... Bb7 {-0.06/16 261} 12. Bc4 {2} 12... d5 {0}
>
>Is this tactical blunder part of the book of Junior6 or is it because of a
>problem with the autoplayer?
>
>Uri
When I watched the game I wonder the same thing about this move (12... d5 : 0
secondes and no evaluation).
It was not a book's blunder because the last book moves is the 9th move.
I was told that the win autoplayer is much stable that the dos version, but it
still not perfect.
Conclusion : the game play with autoplayer must be verified, in each game search
where the program lost the game and look if it's not because of a autoplayer
disfonctionnement.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.