Author: Charles Unruh
Date: 16:29:33 12/26/99
Go up one level in this thread
On December 26, 1999 at 18:59:33, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On December 26, 1999 at 18:33:42, Charles Unruh wrote: > >>I'm not sure what to make of it, and yes i'm sorry if attempts at definitions >>have been given before. I have rebel century and it has an option called "Tiger >>system" Is this Pure Chess tiger? > >it is ed's rebel with a special switch in the search algo that was maybe >taken from tiger. so an idea from christophe in rebel. Is it weaker than the default different style, what's the aim? > >> If so what version? I have tiger dos and i >>know it's tiger. Now on the rebel page i see this line >>" REBEL-TIGER is STRONG and according to the SSDF the strongest one you can get >>on your PC. For the complete list check out the REBEL-TIGER Hall of Fame " > >>Now it APPEARS by this statement that here Rebel-tiger is being equated with >>Tiger 12.0 is this the case? Or is This just shilly shally salesmanship? > >tiger-dos is not sold. tiger-dos is a TEXT-engine without graphics board. >how shall ed or christophe sell a TEXT-engine ??? Thanks, but that wasn't the question(I have tiger 12 anyway, nothing stops true colectors). That statement came directly off the Rebel page and it says that the ssdf says that rebel-tiger is the strongest prog you can buy for your pc. > >therefore they made a joint venture between Rebel/Christophes Tiger/Loka-Soft... >and the result is: > >in the user interface of chesspartner christophes program (12.0 version) >and later, there will be also a kind of rebel in the chesspartner >user-interface. >so in fact 3 programs will share their forces and bring out a program. > > >>Anyways my chess collection bursts at the seems, All i need to complete it, is >>Ferret(Though my clone rules!), and tiger 12 in the partner interface(Dos sucks) > >anyway.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.