Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Computer Chess Xmas Stuff

Author: Albert Silver

Date: 18:53:27 12/26/99

Go up one level in this thread


On December 26, 1999 at 11:30:33, Walter Koroljow wrote:

>After 18 games, I am losing 1.11 points per game. I have studied the game some,
>so I am not a beginner.  It's too early to tell yet, but it seems very strong
>(or I am very weak!).
>
>This is the "tutor" version and it gives numerical evaluations and suggested
>moves when it thinks I could have played better.  It also gives evaluations of
>positions and, in particular, all doubles.  It thinks its doubles are all well
>considered...

That's interesting. I wonder how the doubles calls were chosen? Was it the
result of its own neural development, or does it incorporate the research of
players like Kit Woolsey?
I myself have only played the Jellyfish 3.5 demo, so I don't have access to this
information. Does it say in the manual or help notes?

                                      Albert Silver

>
>This is a very nice toy.  Now if I only had the time to study chess, backgammon,
>etc., etc.
>
>Cheers,
>
>Walter



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.