Author: Peter Fendrich
Date: 09:09:10 12/28/99
Go up one level in this thread
On December 28, 1999 at 08:15:56, Ulrich Tuerke wrote: -- snip -- >>Some criticism to our continuous interpretations of the SSDF list: > >Accounting for the statistical uncertainities, we must conclude that the SSDF >list is not able to determine uniquely a leader. > >The below list is for instance very well consistent with the statement that >Nimzo-7.32 is the strongest program. > > > THE SSDF RATING LIST 1999-11-26 69727 games played by 202 computers > Rating + - Games Won Oppo > ------ --- --- ----- --- ---- > 1 Chess Tiger 12.0 DOS 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2696 44 -40 317 72% 2533 > 2 Fritz 5.32 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2671 45 -41 297 72% 2506 > 3 Nimzo 7.32 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2663 37 -35 409 69% 2526 > > >Please do not over-interprete these numbers. A ELO difference of 20 is >essentially nothing. > >Regards, Uli Absolutely true! But then don't forget that this goes for every list in this universe, including all human rating lists as well. Looking at the current human world ranking list gives at least me some thoughts... //Peter
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.