Author: Graham Laight
Date: 03:56:23 12/29/99
Go up one level in this thread
Hi Bertil! Speaking as someone with insider knowledge of the SSDF ratings, do you think that, at the top end, the ratings might have become too high? In the past, did you used find that, once the SSDF list had been calibrated correctly, the ratings tended to stay at about the correct level by themselves, or, when you tested against human players, did you then have to make significant corrections to the scale? At the moment, there seem to be quite a few people about who strongly feel that the top end of the SSDF list has gone too high (in relation to the FIDE Elo rating list) - and that maybe the top computer programs should be rated more in the region of 2450 than 2696. What are your feelings on the subject? Thanks for your time and thoughts on this. -g
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.