Author: Djordje Vidanovic
Date: 07:05:39 12/29/99
Go up one level in this thread
On December 29, 1999 at 08:10:17, Thorsten Czub wrote: >its exactly what i had after 20 games: 50%. > >fritz6 gets less points vs. tiger. > >i would not say that "the old champ" is alive. >if you count all results together you will see that tiger >is better overall. > >50% against fritz5.32 is not bad. >fritz5.32 is not that good against other programs as tiger is. > >play with fritz6 and you will see yourself. >so we have same results :-))) rarely ! but it happens. Hello Thorsten, My testing (about 40 G/60 games against a couple of top programs -- Hiarcs 7.32 and Nimzo 7.32, on two computers, one PII-400, the other Celeron-400) indicate that Fritz 6 generic (not the test vers. 6.66) is STRONGER than Fritz 5.32. Apart from this small number of games on two computers, I have conducted a series of test games against a variety of other programs at shorter time controls. All the tests, except the very short controls (G/5 and less) confirm my findings. On top of all that, my own subjective, non-quantifiable, impression is that Fritz 6 (generic) is stronger by 20-30 ELO points than Fritz 5.32. Have a Happy New 2000. *** Djordje
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.