Author: James Robertson
Date: 11:25:14 12/29/99
Go up one level in this thread
On December 29, 1999 at 10:05:39, Djordje Vidanovic wrote: >On December 29, 1999 at 08:10:17, Thorsten Czub wrote: > >>its exactly what i had after 20 games: 50%. >> >>fritz6 gets less points vs. tiger. >> >>i would not say that "the old champ" is alive. >>if you count all results together you will see that tiger >>is better overall. >> >>50% against fritz5.32 is not bad. >>fritz5.32 is not that good against other programs as tiger is. >> >>play with fritz6 and you will see yourself. >>so we have same results :-))) rarely ! but it happens. > >Hello Thorsten, > >My testing (about 40 G/60 games against a couple of top programs -- Hiarcs 7.32 >and Nimzo 7.32, on two computers, one PII-400, the other Celeron-400) indicate >that Fritz 6 generic (not the test vers. 6.66) is STRONGER than Fritz 5.32. >Apart from this small number of games on two computers, I have conducted a >series of test games against a variety of other programs at shorter time >controls. All the tests, except the very short controls (G/5 and less) confirm >my findings. On top of all that, my own subjective, non-quantifiable, >impression is that Fritz 6 (generic) is stronger by 20-30 ELO points than Fritz >5.32. > >Have a Happy New 2000. > >*** Djordje Hmm. In a recent tournament I completed, Insomniac scored: Insomniac 0.62 - Fritz 5.32 1.5 - 6.5 Insomniac 0.62 - Fritz 6 4 - 4 Other tournaments I have run had a similar result, although not so extreme. Fritz 6 seems to do better against Crafty and several other programs too. James
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.