Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: SSDF Tiger12.0-Fritz5.32 19-21

Author: Djordje Vidanovic

Date: 18:27:06 12/29/99

Go up one level in this thread


On December 29, 1999 at 16:37:58, Chessfun wrote:

>On December 29, 1999 at 10:05:39, Djordje Vidanovic wrote:
>
>>On December 29, 1999 at 08:10:17, Thorsten Czub wrote:
>>
>>>its exactly what i had after 20 games: 50%.
>>>
>>>fritz6 gets less points vs. tiger.
>>>
>>>i would not say that "the old champ" is alive.
>>>if you count all results together you will see that tiger
>>>is better overall.
>>>
>>>50% against fritz5.32 is not bad.
>>>fritz5.32 is not that good against other programs as tiger is.
>>>
>>>play with fritz6 and you will see yourself.
>>>so we have same results :-))) rarely ! but it happens.
>>
>>Hello Thorsten,
>>
>>My testing (about 40 G/60 games against a couple of top programs -- Hiarcs 7.32
>>and Nimzo 7.32, on two computers, one PII-400, the other Celeron-400) indicate
>>that Fritz 6 generic (not the test vers. 6.66) is STRONGER than Fritz 5.32.
>>Apart from this small number of games on two computers, I have conducted a
>>series of test games against a variety of other programs at shorter time
>>controls.  All the tests, except the very short controls (G/5 and less) confirm
>>my findings.  On top of all that, my own subjective, non-quantifiable,
>>impression is that Fritz 6 (generic) is stronger by 20-30 ELO points than Fritz
>>5.32.
>>
>>Have a Happy New 2000.
>>
>>*** Djordje
>
>Hi Djordje,
>          Could you tell me where you got this Fritz 6.66. Do you test for
>chessbase or is it a Hybrid of your own of Fritz 6 with modified parameters.
>Thanks.....Happy New Year to you.

Hello, both to you and Rajen,

Fritz 6.66 is a new version of Fritz.  Fritz 6 that is already out and
commercial I called generic for want of a better name.  Fritz 6.66 or simply
T.66 is being tested by myself and a couple of other guys along with two other
versions: T.55 and T.67.  My favourite is T.66 for which I have my own nick --
El Diablo, both because of the number symbolism and its phenomenal playing
strength.

I haven't touched the parameters -- I have explicit confidence in Frans Morsch's
logic :)

A Happy New 2000!

*** Djordje




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.