Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 00:50:13 12/30/99
Go up one level in this thread
On December 29, 1999 at 10:43:23, Bertil Eklund wrote: >>play with fritz6 and you will see yourself. >>so we have same results :-))) rarely ! but it happens. > >Hi! > >Nice to see that we can agree sometimes! if the data is the same :-))) why not ? i would write if fritz would be a good program in the moment my data shows it. but ... >At the moment F5.32 seems to have big trouble against Junior5 so I guess Tiger >stays on the top. >I don´t have F6 but I´m impressed with the new Junior6. I guess it is one of the >favorites in your tournament and the two first games (one with J5) indicates >that also. I am also interested how junior6 does. but my main problems come with fritz6. i mean: why don't test fritz6?? there was a big hype that fritz6 is the ultimative reference program. we all bought it. and now it seems it was a big lie. and we have to buy junior6. ok - i did it. and now the guys tell us we should buy nimzo xyz version although i have dozens of nimzo versions and no version impresses me anyway. so what. the whole time these idiots claim: it is the strongest, buy it. and if you do so, you get a thing nobody else tests, the ssdf is not testing, instead working with fritz5.32 (why the hell, all other customers have bought this buggy fritz6.). its a fools world. anybody repeats the pr-statements of another company. sorry. but i hope junior6 does good. i would like to see that at least ONE product i bought from chessbase fullfills the statements they said before. otherwise i would have thrown all my money out of the window directly into freds mouth.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.