Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 00:56:02 12/30/99
Go up one level in this thread
On December 29, 1999 at 10:05:39, Djordje Vidanovic wrote: >On December 29, 1999 at 08:10:17, Thorsten Czub wrote: >Hello Thorsten, > >My testing (about 40 G/60 games against a couple of top programs -- Hiarcs 7.32 >and Nimzo 7.32, on two computers, one PII-400, the other Celeron-400) indicate >that Fritz 6 generic (not the test vers. 6.66) is STRONGER than Fritz 5.32. >Apart from this small number of games on two computers, I have conducted a >series of test games against a variety of other programs at shorter time >controls. All the tests, except the very short controls (G/5 and less) confirm >my findings. On top of all that, my own subjective, non-quantifiable, >impression is that Fritz 6 (generic) is stronger by 20-30 ELO points than Fritz >5.32. > >Have a Happy New 2000. Thanks Djordje ! Happy new 2000 to you too ! ! >*** Djordje imo in short time controls firtz6 might be stronger. this is maybe in 60/60, 60 all, 30 all or any other blitz or active chess. but in 40/120 fritz6 has big troubles in tactics. fritz5.32 is weaker in other parts. tiger e.g. kills fritz6 in 40/120 but has problems with fritz5.32 (only 50% on 40/120). overall fritz6 is a disapointing program. the new graphics are nice but only in the first sight. it is buggy. and behaves more like the difference between windows95 and windows98: windows95 ~ 75 MB space, windows98 750MB :-)))
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.