Author: Harald Faber
Date: 03:23:12 12/30/99
Go up one level in this thread
On December 30, 1999 at 05:44:10, blass uri wrote: >On December 30, 1999 at 04:08:50, Harald Faber wrote: > >>On December 30, 1999 at 03:50:13, Thorsten Czub wrote: >> >>>On December 29, 1999 at 10:43:23, Bertil Eklund wrote: >>> >>>>>play with fritz6 and you will see yourself. >>>>>so we have same results :-))) rarely ! but it happens. >>>> >>>>Hi! >>>> >>>>Nice to see that we can agree sometimes! >>> >>>if the data is the same :-))) >>> >>>why not ? >>>i would write if fritz would be a good program in the moment >>>my data shows it. >>>but ... >> >>You will never write that. Fritz5.32 was SSDF#1 for months. That doesn't and >>didn't fit to your "Fritz is stupid" attitude so you made a sport playing games >>with Fritz5.32 versus a supposed much weaker program to demonstrate that >>Friz5.32 is not the superior program SSDF shows. And now the story continues of >>course with Fritz6. I am not suprised. >> >>>I am also interested how junior6 does. >> >>To smash it agin of course because Junior is a fast searcher (=dumb) and never >>played well on your machines while on others it did? > >Junior won one of thorsten's tournaments. Which one? Which version? >Junior is leading thorsten's millenium tournament with 2 out of 2 together with >tal. Wow! That is impressive, isn't it! >I do not see that Junior never played well on thorsten's machines. > >Uri You neither see nor understand many things here going on. Ask TC directly what he thinks of Junior5 and how J5 performed in his tourneys.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.