Author: Harald Faber
Date: 04:16:05 12/30/99
Go up one level in this thread
On December 30, 1999 at 07:01:46, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On December 30, 1999 at 04:08:50, Harald Faber wrote: > >>You will never write that. Fritz5.32 was SSDF#1 for months. That doesn't and >>didn't fit to your "Fritz is stupid" attitude so you made a sport playing games >>with Fritz5.32 versus a supposed much weaker program to demonstrate that >>Friz5.32 is not the superior program SSDF shows. And now the story continues of >>course with Fritz6. I am not suprised. > >playing fritz6 against tiger, "a supposed much weaker program" >to demonstrate that fritz is not superior tiger. Exception. You played other, weaker opponents like CSTal, against Fritz5. >fritz6 is killed against tiger. >and you believe only thorsten czub gets these results Harald ? Yes. Like I have written a thousand times that only you get exceptional results, like CSTal being in the top-3 of tournaments and Fritz far out of race and so on. >>>I am also interested how junior6 does. >> >>To smash it agin of course because Junior is a fast searcher (=dumb) and never >>played well on your machines while on others it did? > >Complete Nonsense! keep your data straight ! >or do you want to lie ? >junior won one of my tournaments !!! Which one, which Junior version? >has seen my old tournament where junior won. even amir and uri >have seen these in the time i played it. >where have you been ? in holiday ? Closing your eyes about facts >that don't fit into your "mind" ? This does not fit to your statement that Junior does not perform on your machines as well as others have reported. What is it then, do you remember having written so and now change your mind or can't you remember? >>>but my main problems come with fritz6. >>>i mean: why don't test fritz6?? >>>there was a big hype that fritz6 is the ultimative reference >>>program. we all bought it. and now it seems it was a big lie. >> >>? >>You don't have data but you say it SEEMS (attention! keyword!) it was a lie that >>F6 is reference? > >I have data. it loses a lot. i bought the program harald. >i let fritz6 play against all kind of opponents. its a loser. :-) As I already wrote, I am not surprised to read that. >fritz5.32 plays better. :-) But still badly, right? :-) >i have posted the games here and also at gambit soft. >you oversee again ? I only know of your match against Tiger and now the 2 rounds. What did I miss? >>Made for fools who believe in every written word. > >i do not believe in what they say- Why did you buy it then? >therefore i have said they lie. Why? Isn't it possible that it IS reference if you take out Tiger which is not commercial yet? >YOU defend them, not me. So what? I also do not like Fritz playing style much, but the score speaks for itself, you can't deny it.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.