Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: SSDF Elo Scale Too High?

Author: Albert Silver

Date: 12:47:03 12/30/99

Go up one level in this thread


On December 30, 1999 at 05:57:15, blass uri wrote:

>On December 30, 1999 at 03:45:17, Harald Faber wrote:
>
>>On December 30, 1999 at 02:33:56, blass uri wrote:
>>
>>>>I'm not going to get dragged into this again, but I will say that if a program
>>>>is said to be playing at 2600, then test it against 2600 players and see how it
>>>>does. Showing it can beat up players rated 200-400 points less means very
>>>>little, even if it can be entertaining. Just my 2 cents. I'm aware that can be
>>>>incredibly difficult to arrange, but I see no other way around this, if the
>>>>truth is what is being sought. Being 2600 means more than beating 2400 players,
>>>>it means holding your own against 2600 players, no? I think this upcoming
>>>>Israeli leagure in which both Junior 6 (Deep Junior?) and Rebel Century will be
>>>>playing should be quite instructive as the human opponents, due to the nature of
>>>>the event, will be very motivated.
>>>>
>>>>                                     Albert Silver
>>>
>>>I think that the performance of Rebel,Deep Junior and Fritz in the Israeli
>>>league is going to be lower than the real rating of them because of the fact
>>>that the opponent teams can choose the human to play against the computer.
>>>
>>>Uri
>>
>>And what is the point? Why should the TPR be lower than supposed? Do you expect
>>the teams sending ELO2000 for comp-playing? Does the Israel-first league have
>>such players?
>
>No but they can choose players who know better to play against computers.
>
>They can prefer 2400 player with a positional style to play the computer and not
>2500 player who like to play for tactical positions when computers are better.
>
>Uri

Sorry to say this, but that has been my point from the beginning. You are saying
that these 2500-2600 computers are only well equipped to handle one style of
play, and will be at a disadvantage against opponents whose style do not fit it;
yet their 2500-2600 human peers do not (of course there are always exceptions).
Could it be that there IS indeed a difference? Otherwise their ratings are a
fiction.

                                      Albert Silver



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.