Author: CLiebert
Date: 14:11:36 12/30/99
Go up one level in this thread
On December 30, 1999 at 13:32:49, blass uri wrote: >On December 30, 1999 at 12:50:31, ERIQ wrote: > >>any and all opinions on this topic are welcome. >> >> sign, >> Eriq > >I guess that it is better than Junior5 because it is not logical to release >worse version but if you want to be more sure you can wait to see more results >of games. > >Fritz's programmers release new versions very often so there is a good chance >that there will not be an improvement because of a mistake of the programmers. > >It is not the case with Junior. > >I have not Junior6 but I know that there are some improvements in the positional >understanding of Junior5.9 relative to Junior5. >(example:Junior5 can fall in the trap of taking h2 by the bishop when the bishop >is trapped when Junior5.9 does it less often) > >One change in Junior is reducing the value of the pawn and it can sometimes >counter productive(For example Junior5.9(and also Junior6) cannot see Junior's >good sacrifice against nimzo) >This change is sometimes productive when Junior does a good sacrifice of a pawn >or avoid taking a poisoned pawn. > >Uri Jun6 is definetly stronger than Jun5. In blitz and activ games I got 60-80 elo points playing more than 500 games against 20 different opponents (!) on cel 525 mhz hardware with unique book and see/nunn-test. It is the only engine which resists fritz6x for now, but the last one seems still to be a little bit better again... Christian
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.